Jabran.com — Claims (plain text) =============================== Total: 45 * [defended] Authority is not conserved across an epistemic boundary. CLAIM-000038 https://jabran.com/claims/ljr-claim-01 Cite: Jabran I. Chaudry, The Law of Jurisdictional Reacquisition (Jabran.com, 2026), § V. * [defended] Never allow continuity of intelligence to conceal discontinuity of warrant. CLAIM-000045 https://jabran.com/claims/ljr-claim-08 Cite: Jabran I. Chaudry, The Law of Jurisdictional Reacquisition (Jabran.com, 2026), § XXVI. * [defended] Jurisdiction-sensitive refusal can constitute superior epistemic performance. CLAIM-000044 https://jabran.com/claims/ljr-claim-07 Cite: Jabran I. Chaudry, The Law of Jurisdictional Reacquisition (Jabran.com, 2026), § XIX. * [defended] An outsider may acquire greater epistemic jurisdiction than an incumbent by satisfying the relevant conditions of justified reliance more successfully. CLAIM-000043 https://jabran.com/claims/ljr-claim-06 Cite: Jabran I. Chaudry, The Law of Jurisdictional Reacquisition (Jabran.com, 2026), § XIV. * [defended] Competence in one component of a heterogeneous decision does not entail jurisdiction over the whole. CLAIM-000042 https://jabran.com/claims/ljr-claim-05 Cite: Jabran I. Chaudry, The Law of Jurisdictional Reacquisition (Jabran.com, 2026), § XIII. * [defended] Where perceived authority exceeds warranted authority, an authority debt exists. CLAIM-000041 https://jabran.com/claims/ljr-claim-04 Cite: Jabran I. Chaudry, The Law of Jurisdictional Reacquisition (Jabran.com, 2026), § X. * [defended] Other things equal, the burden of jurisdictional reacquisition increases with jurisdictional distance. CLAIM-000040 https://jabran.com/claims/ljr-claim-03 Cite: Jabran I. Chaudry, The Law of Jurisdictional Reacquisition (Jabran.com, 2026), § VIII. * [defended] Where the conditions that justify authority change, authority survives only to the extent that its justification survives. CLAIM-000039 https://jabran.com/claims/ljr-claim-02 Cite: Jabran I. Chaudry, The Law of Jurisdictional Reacquisition (Jabran.com, 2026), § XXIX. * [defended] The warrant required for contact rises discontinuously with its class, and the classes are not orderable by force magnitude. CLAIM-000030 https://jabran.com/claims/bai-claim-05 * [defended] Automating an undervalued task transfers the undervaluation rather than removing it, to the automation and to the humans who remain. CLAIM-000031 https://jabran.com/claims/bai-claim-09 * [defended] Authority that cannot be verified between machines cannot govern systems operating across households, institutions, and jurisdictions. CLAIM-000036 https://jabran.com/claims/bai-claim-13 * [defended] A dwelling's defining expectations are unstated, and are therefore violable without breach of any term the household agreed to. CLAIM-000035 https://jabran.com/claims/bai-claim-06 * [defended] The inferability of a fact about a person is not a justification for inferring it, and incidental inference is not a justification for acting on it. CLAIM-000034 https://jabran.com/claims/bai-claim-08 * [defended] Autonomy presented as a substitute for supervision reduces the number of answerable parties without reducing the harm, thereby transferring risk from those who profit to those subject. CLAIM-000033 https://jabran.com/claims/bai-claim-10 * [defended] An error shared across a population is not an anomaly but a practice, and is therefore undetectable by mechanisms that identify deviation. CLAIM-000032 https://jabran.com/claims/bai-claim-11 * [defended] Retention converts perception into record and disclosure converts record into testimony; each transition increases moral weight and decreases the observed person's control. CLAIM-000037 https://jabran.com/claims/bai-claim-07 * [defended] The governance a system requires is determined by the modality of its output, not by the magnitude of its capability; at the point where inference is coupled to matter, evaluation of content ceases to be sufficient. CLAIM-000025 https://jabran.com/claims/bai-claim-02 * [defended] As generality rises, the gap between what a system can do and what it may do widens without limit, and only the second admits governance. CLAIM-000026 https://jabran.com/claims/bai-claim-12 * [defended] Authorisation is logically prior to optimisation: no improvement in an objective can supply the standing that the act requires. CLAIM-000027 https://jabran.com/claims/bai-claim-03 * [canonical] An embodied system may act only when the proposed action is justified by task, permission, safety, privacy, dignity, reversibility, and answerability together. CLAIM-000028 https://jabran.com/claims/bai-claim-01 * [defended] Compliance is informative only if refusal is possible; a system that complies universally provides no evidence about the propriety of any particular compliance. CLAIM-000029 https://jabran.com/claims/bai-claim-04 * [proposed] The artificial polymath has breadth without biography. CLAIM-000023 https://jabran.com/claims/ar-claim-artificial-polymath * [proposed] Information does not contain its own rank. CLAIM-000015 https://jabran.com/claims/ar-claim-information-rank * [proposed] Relation is not relevance. CLAIM-000016 https://jabran.com/claims/ar-claim-relation-not-relevance * [proposed] Relevance is the justified priority of a relation under value, consequence, and answerability. CLAIM-000017 https://jabran.com/claims/ar-claim-relevance-definition * [proposed] Salience is not warrant. CLAIM-000018 https://jabran.com/claims/ar-claim-salience-not-warrant * [proposed] Attention is the first ethical field. CLAIM-000019 https://jabran.com/claims/ar-claim-attention-ethical * [proposed] The frame problem has become civilizational. CLAIM-000020 https://jabran.com/claims/ar-claim-frame-civilizational * [proposed] Institutions are relevance machines. CLAIM-000021 https://jabran.com/claims/ar-claim-institutions-relevance * [proposed] AI governance is relevance governance. CLAIM-000022 https://jabran.com/claims/ar-claim-ai-governance * [proposed] The human role after machine breadth is the preservation of answerable relevance. CLAIM-000024 https://jabran.com/claims/ar-claim-human-role * [defended] Polymathy is not the possession of many knowledges but the perception and transport of deep structure across domains. CLAIM-000001 https://jabran.com/claims/tum-claim-01 * [defended] A serious work should not seek immunity from refutation, but a structure clear enough that refutation, if it comes, will be exact. CLAIM-000014 https://jabran.com/claims/tum-claim-14 * [defended] The age of cheap breadth is the age in which selfhood becomes the decisive human competence. CLAIM-000013 https://jabran.com/claims/tum-claim-13 * [defended] The human contribution in an age of artificial polymaths is the integration of breadth under a unified horizon of value. CLAIM-000012 https://jabran.com/claims/tum-claim-12 * [defended] Relevance, warrant, and answerability are normative and teleological, not merely structural. CLAIM-000011 https://jabran.com/claims/tum-claim-11 * [defended] The machine has structure without stakes. CLAIM-000010 https://jabran.com/claims/tum-claim-10 * [defended] Large machine-learning systems are artificial polymaths because they supply structural breadth across domains. CLAIM-000009 https://jabran.com/claims/tum-claim-09 * [defended] The tragedy of the polymathic mind is the proliferation of beginnings without completion. CLAIM-000008 https://jabran.com/claims/tum-claim-08 * [defended] The genuine polymath is neither the narrow specialist nor the dilettante, but the Aristotelian mean between parochialism and shallow breadth. CLAIM-000007 https://jabran.com/claims/tum-claim-07 * [defended] Specialization produces depth, but it systematically underproduces the connections between deep wells of knowledge. CLAIM-000006 https://jabran.com/claims/tum-claim-06 * [defended] The brain is itself polymathic insofar as it reuses and redeploys circuitry across functions. CLAIM-000005 https://jabran.com/claims/tum-claim-05 * [defended] Consilience is polymathy performed by a civilization rather than by a single person. CLAIM-000004 https://jabran.com/claims/tum-claim-04 * [defended] The apparent breadth of the polymath is the surface manifestation of underlying structural depth. CLAIM-000003 https://jabran.com/claims/tum-claim-03 * [defended] Disciplines are administrative partitions of labor, not natural seams in reality. CLAIM-000002 https://jabran.com/claims/tum-claim-02